by Miroslav Volf
“Do you really believe all that stuff you’ve written about [in Free of Charge]?” an acquaintance asked me.
“Stuff!? What stuff?”
“You know, all this stuff about God the giver, about how you are supposed to give as God gives, and especially that when we give it’s really God giving through us. You say that Christ forgives through us, that human beings are sacred dwelling places of God, that they become fulfilled when they resonate with God’s love. It seems so . . . unreal, like a religious fairy tale!”
“I wouldn’t call it ‘stuff ’,” I answered defensively.
“I don’t mean to dis it. It’s beautiful, of course, what your parents did, forgiving that soldier. It sounds beautiful to tend a single rose like the Little Prince did, and even see the stars differently as a result. Your vision of a life of generosity and forgiveness is beautiful . . .”
“It’s not mine, you know.”
“But it’s beautiful as dreams are beautiful – beautifully unreal. Remember the movie Life Is Beautiful? In it, there was a kid in a concentration camp, Giosue, whose father created for him an illusion of living a normal life by pretending that the whole thing was an elaborate game. The life you describe is beautiful in that way, as an ingenious ruse.”
“I think I know what you mean, but . . .”
“When I look at how we actually live,” he continued, “when I think about how we are wired to live, all that talk about unselfish generosity and forgiveness makes no sense. We play a game of giving and forgiving, but the game was designed to mask a harsh reality that we are afraid to look at unadorned. We all just strive to maximize our ‘profits’, by whatever means society will let us get away with. We ‘give’ to get; we ‘forgive’ when it’s in our interest. That’s all there is –our profit, our interest, our insatiable egos. We are bundles of sophisticated, complex matter, each bundle hustling to survive and thrive, sometimes with others’ help, but mostly at others’ expense. And then we cover the tracks of our selfishness by ‘giving’ and ‘forgiving’.”
“You’ve stripped us naked, and with our clothes off, we’re not a pretty sight,” I said.
“But that’s the way we are! What you write in this book is one long, comforting, beautiful lie.”
“Lie? A strong word . . .”
“ . . . needed to hide the brutal reality.”
“I confess,” I continued, speaking half to myself and half to him, “I do wake up sometimes in the middle of the night, surrounded by the darkness, and think, ‘We’re all a bunch of egoists, some more pleasant than others, some smart enough to be short-term altruists, but we’re just stuffing ourselves and puffing ourselves up. Maybe no love has created us, no love dwells in our deceitful hearts, and no world of love will ever be given to us. We come out of inchoate darkness, and we return to inchoate darkness, and in the brief period we are alive, we are black holes of self-absorption.’ ”
“Now you’re talking. So why did you write the book? To put yourself back to sleep and return with a good conscience to your dream world? You can’t exorcise cruel reality with a pleasant dream!”
“When the dawn comes,” I continued with more conviction, “and I see the huge orange ball rising over Long Island Sound, I realize that, awake in the middle of the night, I was tempted by the voices of darkness! Do you know what happens when my son Aaron climbs into my bed, looks at me with those big doe eyes of his, when he gives me one of his unforgettable smiles, mischievous and tender at the same time, when he tells me ‘I love you’ as he burrows his head into the pillow next to mine? Do you know what happens then? I think, ‘That smile – and my failure to get angry with him for having awoken me from a short night’s sleep at 5:30 a.m.! – doesn’t quite fit into the story of our bottomless egotism.’ ”
“It’s touching that you love your son and that your son loves you. But as you know, that ‘love’ can be explained . . .”
“ . . . with one of those explanations that reduce complex human experiences to simple underlying causes,” I said, a bit irritated. “Yes, I know such reductive explanations well. If you are smart enough and armed with a vivid imagination, you can reduce anything to anything else – well, almost anything. Marx reduced religion to the ‘sigh of the oppressed creature’, Nietzsche reduced morality to resentment of the weak, Freud reduced . . .”
“ . . . you’re talking about pseudo-science . . .”
“There’s a difference, I agree. But hard sciences also offer reductive explanations. They are right and immensely useful in their own domains, but once they leave those domains, they distort reality. . .”
“ . . . they don’t distort. They explain and describe without fuzzy fluff!”
“After the hard sciences are done with their explaining, Aaron’s smile will be gone as if it were wiped off his face. Of course, if, armed with scientific explanations, you took a photo of his face looking at me, it would still look exactly the same as if he were smiling, only that he wouldn’t be smiling. The same facial grimace would be there, but the smile would be gone. A genuine smile is infused with a whole universe of meaning that the hard sciences cannot get at. The reality of that smile says to me that the world can’t just be there on its own, a surd fact of matter’s strange complexification, located between the Big Bang with which this universe started and the Big Whimper with which it is likely to end.”
“Was that supposed to be proof of God’s existence!? Aaron smiles, therefore God exists! One fine argument! It will go down in the books as ‘Volf ’s proof of God’s existence’!”
“You missed my point. No, nothing like proof of God’s existence. I am inclined to think God’s existence cannot be proven. Aaron’s smile is more like a crack in the naturalist’s ‘reality’. And besides, it illustrates that what you referred to as ‘fuzzy fluff ’ is sometimes the very best of what life is made of – a crack as a window into the true nature of reality.”
“You certainly see a lot in that smile . . .”
“You’d be surprised by what you can see in a single smile if you know how to look. If you look really carefully, and if you look with the eyes of the heart, you might even ‘see’ God. God is smiling at me in Aaron’s smile. God is shining in that large orange ball just rising over the horizon.”
“I don’t believe in God.”
“But you like the God who gives and forgives as a character, as an image, as a vision, right?”
“It’s a pretty good god as gods go, the only trouble being that I can’t believe in any of them.”
“You don’t need to believe in God before you can embark upon this way of life.”
“What!?” he exclaimed. “I thought that everything in that way of life depended on God. God gives and forgives, and so should we. God gives and forgives – and so can we, not in our own right but by echoing God’s giving and forgiving. Take God away and everything collapses. I got this right, didn’t I?
“You did. Everything does depend on God – just not on our belief in God. It depends on God’s presence in our life. And God is present to us whether we believe or not.”
“How inconsiderate of God! Doesn’t God know anything about privacy, about being left alone when you want to be alone?”
“God has an excuse. God didn’t grow up in an upper-middleclass family with a bedroom of his own . . . Seriously, try not to think of it as being disrespectful of your wishes but as being kind – like a lover who doesn’t give up on the beloved, even though he has been betrayed, but keeps sending her a rose, or a poem, or whatever.”
“But a lover should leave her alone if she writes him a note that she would rather live without his advances. And it seems to me that my belief that God doesn’t exist counts as such a note.”
“Does it? At any rate, God is a peculiar kind of lover . . .”
“Very peculiar . . .”
“God is by definition present everywhere, which makes it difficult for God to leave non-believers to themselves, to be absent from their lives. God is not like a human being, a discrete individual located in one place at any given time, a place that can be marked as distinct from any place you and I, along with everyone else in the world, find ourselves. Moreover, you and I wouldn’t even be there to occupy this or that space, to believe or not to believe, if it were not for God being present in us, giving us life, one breath after another, one heartbeat after another.”
“Heavy stuff!”
“You don’t want a plain and uncomplicated God. I guarantee you, it’ll turn out being an idol.”
“Still, it seems strange as a nonbeliever to take up a way of life that only makes sense if you believe in God. It’s like slipping into somebody else’s shoes.”
“Milan Kundera, a Czech dissident writer who now lives in Paris, wrote a book three decades ago titled Laughable Loves. Do you know it? It doesn’t matter if you don’t. It’s about ‘weight’ and ‘lightness’ in our lives, the kind of stuff he explored in The Unbearable Lightness of Being. Edward, the hero of one part of the book, longed for something essential, that he could take truly seriously, and he couldn’t find it ‘in his love affairs, or in his teaching, or in his thoughts. That’s why he longed for God.’ ”
“I can’t say that I long for God.”
“But you seem to long for a beautiful life – you’re the one who brought up the phrase. And you also suggested between the lines that it is a life that only God can give. In any case, I don’t want to compare what you want with what Kundera’s Edward wanted, though the two of you may be closer than you appear to be. Edward occasionally sat in church and looked thoughtfully at the cupola. ‘Let us take leave of him,’ writes Kundera at the end of the book, ‘at just such a time. It is afternoon, the church is quiet and empty. Edward is sitting in a pew tormented with sorrow, because God does not exist. But just at this moment his sorrow is so great that suddenly from its depth emerges the genuine living face of God.’ ”
“Kundera is playing on Nietzsche’s famous comment about the death of God and the churches as sepulchers of God, isn’t he?”
“I think that’s right. But I didn’t mean for us to discuss Kundera’s relation to Nietzsche . . .”
“You want me to go and sit in a church?”
“I want you to slip into a way of life you say you like, as you might slip into a church building. I want you to sit in it, or rather, walk around inside it for a while. There, you just might discover a living God – not at the end of an argument, but in the midst of a life well lived.”
From Free of Charge by Miroslav Volf