Monday with Mounce 4: Semicolons and Translation by Bill Mounce

Passage: Romans 9:4

In a world of dwindling sentence length and complex sentence structures, the semi-colon has fallen on hard times. It is too bad. It has the ability to stop the reader ever so slightly, and indicate that while there is some sequence of thought (much like a comma), there is also a stop (but of less strength than a period).

Case in point is Romans 9:4. Paul is expressing his deep desire for the salvation of the Jewish nation. In reciting their privileges he says, "They are Israelites, and to them belong the adoption, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises" (ESV). It reads as a sequence, a series of privileges given to the Jewish nation.

But note the TNIV translation and the effect of a semi-colon. "the people of Israel. Theirs is the adoption; theirs the divine glory, the covenants, the receiving of the law, the temple worship and the promises." The semi-colon marks the national "adoption" as a primary privilege, and extending from that adoption they receive glory, covenants, etc. Whether you agree with the interpretation or not, you can see the value of punctuation in translation, albeit a nuanced value in this case.

Someone might say that this is being overly interpretive. Perhaps, but look what happens if you undertranslate it. If you think that "adoption" is the head term and the others extend out from it, and if you simply use commas, you are misleading the reader. Sequence in English doesn't allow for the first in the sequence to be the head term.

Let's look at another example perhaps closer to home. Paul tells Timothy that an elder must be above reproach (anepilempton), the husband of one wife, sober-minded, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, etc. (1 Tim 3:2). What is the relationship of these qualities? Are they all equal? If so, what does "above reproach" mean?

What adds to this question is the observation that Paul appears to start every list of leadership qualifications with a general term. Deacons and their wives (or female deacons) are to be "dignified" (3:8,11, ESV). Paul tells Titus that elders are to be "above reproach" (anenkletos, Titus 1:6, ESV). The suggestion is that the primary quality of church leadership in 1 Timothy 3 is that they are to be above reproach, and then the following qualities fill out what that means. It doesn?t mean they have to be perfect or that no one can have made a charge against them. In means that in an overall sense, they must be irreproachable.

So how do you translate that? Because the ESV is committed to simplicity and transparency, I did not even think to argue for a semi-colon after "reproach." Almost every translation follows suit, even though almost every commentary accepts this interpretation.

The lone exception is the TEV, which does use a semi-colon. The NLT shortens the verse into several sentences, but it is hard to know if they did so because they wanted short sentences or because they saw "above reproach" as the head quality. "For an elder must be a man whose life cannot be spoken against. He must be faithful to his wife." (see also the New Jerusalem).

The leaders of the church "must have an impeccable character" (New Jerusalem). This means they are faithful to their wife, self-controlled, restrained, hospitable, able to teach, gentle, and so forth. One of the mistakes I made in my commentary was to accept a standard interpretation at this point. Some authors use this as "evidence" against Pauline authorship. They say that the requirements are so minimal, barely above those of secular society, so devoid of common Pauline themes of righteousness and Christian virtues, that Paul could not have written these words. I accepted their critique that these were minimal standards and yet argued for Pauline authorship on other grounds.

And then I became a pastor of a young church. We found ourselves looking and searching for people whose lives measured up to these "secular" standards, and were constantly wondering where were the future leaders of the church. We couldn't find them. The fact of the matter is that the standards are very high. To be a person of impeccable character in all areas of his life -- marriage; personal restraint; relationships with others; interaction with conflict; finances -- and then on top of this to be able to teach the truth and refute error (Titus 1:9), and to be courageous enough to lead, this indeed is a rare find. This is why in most churches these future leaders must be encouraged and taught; they don?t grow on trees. But then again, Paul says that a church leader "must" be above reproach. No exceptions for any church that wants to be biblical.

All of this from a semi-colon, showing that "above reproach" is a general quality defined by following terms.

William D. [Bill] Mounce posts every Monday about the Greek language, exegesis, and related topics at Koinonia. He is the author of numerous books, including the bestselling Basics of Biblical Greek, and served as the New Testament chair of the English Standard Version Bible translation. Visit www.billmounce.com for more info or read his blog (co-authored with scholar and his father Bob Mounce) at www.supportministry.com.

Comments

[Pat]

In the NASB,the translators opted for a word to set apart the first item in the lists. I Tim. 3:2 is translated, "An overseer, THEN, must be above reproach," (emphasis added) and Titus 1:6 is translated, "...NAMELY, if any man is above reproach" (again, emphasis added).

I disagree with those who feel that the qualifications are "barely above those of secular society." While similar qualifications may be required of those in secular society, the difference is in the believer who takes these qualifications seriously and lives them out. So many times, as we have seen, there are those that may have taken oaths requiring such behavior and they have not lived up to them. Christians are also not immune, which points to the necessity for our reliance upon the Holy Spirit. I also think churches would do well to remember that being above reproach is the first item listed. Not a Bible scholar, or ability to walk on water, or a big giver, etc. So many times, leaders are criticized for what they don't or cannot do, rather than as you said, encouraging and teaching them. This unfortunately ties in to the misconception that Christians and Christian leaders have somehow arrived, when in fact, we are people very much in need of the Savior's grace.

[Bill Mounce]

Thanks for the clarification for the NASB. Because of their translation philosophy of being as word for word as possible, it didn't occur to me to check them. The American church is now involved in a fight for its life, and much of it centers on the nature of its leadership. Unqualified good people, or ungodly power mongers, rule many of our churches, and this at all levels of leadership (elders, pastors, deacons), and the gospel is not proclaimed or lived out. This cant be what Jesus envisioned.

[Bill Mounce]

I went back and checked the NASB a little more closely. I think that the "then" in 1 Tim 3:2 is not a recognition that "above reproach" is the head term. I think it is a translation of the dei, tying chapter 3 into chapter 2. The "namely" in Titus 1:6, I believe, is more of an issue of an awkward sentence structure going from v 5 to v 6. Perhaps I shouldn't comment on posts when I am on vacation.